The 1629 Thomas(ine) Hall
case offers an invaluable account of seventeenth-century gender fluidity,
ambiguous body presentation, and non-normative sexual behavior; since 1978 it
has inspired quite a range of different readings. The point of consistency
across 35 years of scholarship on the case is the fact that Hall and the other
parties present before the General Court in Jamestown on March 25th, 1629, have
been interpreted in ways that trace shifting models for theorizing gender and
sexual identity during the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-centuries.
Much of the work on Hall and her/his community is excellent; however, taken as
a whole this body of scholarship implies the historical possibility of an
originary feminist or queer (or both) early American community, effectively
eliding important distinctions among different groups as well as downplaying
their significance in our own period. The author argues that while we can and
should apply the tools of gender theory and sexuality studies to early American
subjects, the diversity in interpretations of the Hall case suggests that we
need to be even more rigorous in avoiding descriptions that risk implying that
our own notions of identity can be superimposed onto the past.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment